Posted on: April 16, 2021 Posted by: Anna Lee Comments: 0


arlier this week, the Sixth Circuit Court docket of Appeals in PreTerm-Cleveland v. McCloud upheld an Ohio regulation forbidding medical doctors from knowingly performing an abortion on an unborn little one identified with Down syndrome.

As a result of a number of of the concurrences referenced a 2019 concurrence by Justice Clarence Thomas in Field v. Deliberate Parenthood — during which he illustrated the hyperlink between the logic of selective abortion and the historical past of eugenics — the Sixth Circuit resolution has occasioned commentary from abortion proponents who argue that abortions chosen due to a Down-syndrome analysis usually are not eugenic in nature.

Writing in Slate, Mark Joseph Stern alleges that the

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Comment