Well being authorities within the Mediterranean metropolis had obtained 4,000 doses of the Oxford jab and had supposed to vaccinate lecturers and police over the age of 55 on Saturday and Sunday. Nevertheless solely 50 folks signed as much as the scheme, ensuing within the vaccine centre closing its doorways early at 1pm on Saturday. Anne Frackowiak-Jacobs, the sub-prefect of close by Grasse, advised The Solar that the low uptake was virtually definitely all the way down to fears in regards to the security of the vaccine, that had partly been fuelled by Mr Macron.
She mentioned: “There have been individuals who circled after they realized that it was the AstraZeneca vaccine.”
The French President’s always shifting and contradictory statements in regards to the jab seem to have taken their toll on public confidence
At varied occasions, Mr Macron has publicly questioned its efficacy and security – at one stage even quickly suspending its use.
He famously described the vaccine as being “quasi-effective”, earlier than agreeing himself to take it.
Though the vaccine has been linked to a small variety of very uncommon blood clots , the European Medicines Company has continued to advocate its use, saying the advantages outweighed the dangers.
France has bought 4.7 million doses of the Oxford jab, however to this point has solely administered 2.3 million, in keeping with knowledge offered by the European Centre for Illness Prevention and Management.
The French President got here in for a barrage of criticism when he was pressured to reintroduce the lockdown and now faces a battle to save lots of his political profession.
Bruno Cautrès advised the New York Instances that Mr Macron’s dealing with of the pandemic could possibly be a decisive think about subsequent yr’s presidential elections, the place he faces a powerful problem from Marine Le Pen.
The political scientist, from the Heart for Political Analysis at Sciences Po in Paris, mentioned on the time of announcement of the brand new lockdown: “What seems at the moment is, quite the opposite, the thought of a head of state who performs it by ear and who doesn’t actually know the place he’s going.